Proud to call Indiana my home. Finally some abortion laws that make sense.

Proud to call Indiana my home. Finally something that makes sense. Don’t want to have a kid or can’t afford a kid? Then don’t sleep with someone you dont want to have a kid with. This still permits abortions for rapes or life altering events as well as medically necessary abortions, which I agree with.

IMO this is how it should be. People need to be held accountable for their actions and having sex means there could be a child as a result of having sex. I’m 33 and kid free, its not hard to do if you aren’t a moron.

Read more here: https://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/indiana-house-approves-near-total-abortion-ban-final-senate-vote-friday-night/article_e0494c7f-217f-5517-9d0a-095adfbcb88d.html

Text from the above linked article since they have a paywall/adblocker thing:

The government of Indiana is on the verge of mandating every Hoosier woman who becomes pregnant to carry the pregnancy to term and deliver a baby, unless the pregnancy involves a life-altering trauma.

On Friday, the Republican-controlled House voted 62-38 to approve Senate Bill 1, sending the measure back to the Republican-controlled Senate for a final decision on advancing it to Republican Gov. Eric Holcomb to be signed into law or vetoed.

The Senate is expected to vote on final passage sometime after 5:30 p.m. Region time Friday.

The legislation bans all abortions in Indiana from the moment of conception, except within 10 weeks of fertilization for pregnancies caused by rape or incest, or 20 weeks if necessary to prevent serious physical impairment or the death of a pregnant woman, or because of a lethal fetal anomaly.

It also shuts down all abortion clinics in the state by requiring every abortion be completed in a hospital or hospital-owned surgical center, puts doctors at risk of losing their medical license if they fail to sufficiently justify the legal basis for an abortion, and opens the door for Republican Attorney General Todd Rokita to file criminal charges alleging an illegal abortion in place of locally elected county prosecutors.

At the same time, the measure explicitly exempts in vitro fertilization programs from the restrictions on abortion and appears to leave intact current state laws relating to the availability of contraceptives and the ability of women to travel to other states to obtain an abortion.

The House vote in favor of the proposal followed more than four hours of debate that was, at times, passionate and emotional, but largely respectful, notwithstanding occasional shouts in opposition from the public gallery overlooking the chamber and continuous loud chanting against the measure from Hoosiers standing in the Statehouse rotunda.

Among Northwest Indiana lawmakers, the House vote split along party lines with the Region’s Republican representatives all supporting the near-total abortion ban and the Region’s Democratic representatives uniformly opposed.

If ultimately enacted by the governor, Indiana would become the first state to legislatively enact new abortion restrictions following the June 24 Dobbs v. Jackson ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that rescinded the right to abortion established by the high court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.

Public opinion polls show a majority of Hoosiers oppose strict limits on abortion access. Nevertheless, the measure will end a half-century of pregnant Hoosier women having an individual choice to bring a child into the world or to terminate their pregnancy prior to fetal viability.

Supporters of the proposal estimate it will eradicate approximately 95% of abortions in the state. According to the Indiana Department of Health, there were 8,414 abortions in Indiana during the 2021 calendar year.

“Our goal through this legislation is to strengthen protections for the unborn while stepping up support for families,” said state Rep. Wendy McNamara, R-Evansville, the sponsor and a LaPorte native. “It is consistent with our overall goal to care for mother and baby.”

At least two House Republicans, state Reps. John Jacob, R-Indianapolis, and Curt Nisly, R-Milford, voted against the plan because it fails to prohibit all abortions by including exceptions for rape, incest, and the life and health of a pregnant woman.

Jacob said in a post-Roe world it is “weak” and “pathetic” for Indiana lawmakers to fail to fulfill their repeated promises to Christian Hoosiers and Republican voters to entirely ban abortion if given the opportunity.

“This bill justifies the wicked, those murdering babies, and punishes the righteous, the pre-born human babies,” Jacob said. “By continuing to regulate baby murder in this bill you are inviting the judgment of God on our state and on our nation.”

“God will not bless a state that kills its children,” he added.

On the other hand, several Democratic representatives observed Indiana stands to lose much more by denying women bodily autonomy and signaling to businesses that the state is willing to use the heavy hand of government to pick winners and losers on a divisive social issue.

“This is a sad day for our state,” said state Rep. Carolyn Jackson, D-Hammond. “We are voting to take away the rights of Hoosier women to choose what happens with their bodies.”

Jackson said if the measure becomes law Indiana will become a “wasteland” as OB/GYNs and other doctors flee the state, thousands of children are born each year to women who either don’t want or can’t afford them, and some women resort to unsafe abortions to terminate their pregnancies.

“Women, especially black women and low-income women, will die because of this bill,” Jackson said. “It’s cruel, it is unjust and it is downright despicable.”

State Rep. Ragen Hatcher, D-Gary, noted in no other circumstance does the state control what happens to a person’s body, since individual consent is required to donate blood, donate organs, or get a vaccine — even if needed to save a life.

“This bill tells women the moment they become pregnant that the fertilized egg that cannot live outside her body has more rights than she does,” Hatcher said.

Similarly, state Rep. Pat Boy, D-Michigan City, and state Rep. Earl Harris Jr., D-East Chicago, said women will become “second-class citizens” in Indiana if the proposal is signed into law.

“Women are more than capable of making this decision on their own,” Harris said.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

15 − 10 =